Anglish translation
| § | Original Text | Anglish Translation | Runic Transcription |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The science1 which is perhaps2 the most deeply affected3 by physics4 is chemistry5. Historically6, the early days of chemistry5 dealt almost entirely7 with what we now call inorganic8 chemistry5, the chemistry5 of substances9 which are not associated10 with living things. Considerable11 analysis12 was required13 to discover14 the existence15 of the many elements16 and their relationships17—how they make the various18 relatively19 simple20 compounds21 found in rocks, earth, etc22. This early chemistry5 was very23 important24 for physics4. The interaction25 between the two sciences26 was very23 great because27 the theory28 of atoms29 was substantiated30 to a large extent31 by experiments32 in chemistry5. The theory28 of chemistry5, i.e.33, of the reactions34 themselves, was summarized35 to a large extent31 in the periodic36 chart37 of Mendeleev, which brings out many strange38 relationships17 among the various18 elements16, and it was the collection39 of rules40 as to which substance41 is combined42 with which, and how, that constituted43 inorganic8 chemistry5. All these rules40 were ultimately44 explained45 in principle46 by quantum mechanics47, so that theoretical48 chemistry5 is in fact49 physics4. On the other hand, it must be emphasized50 that this explanation51 is in principle52. We have already discussed53 the difference54 between knowing the rules40 of the game of chess55, and being able to56 play. So it is that we may know the rules40, but we cannot play very23 well. It turns out57 to be very23 difficult58 to predict59 precisely60 what will happen in a given chemical61 reaction62; nevertheless, the deepest part63 of theoretical48 chemistry5 must end up in quantum mechanics47. | The seeklore1 which is maybe2 the most deeply swayed3 by worldlore4 is blendlore5. Yorely6, the early days of blendlore5 dealt almost wholly7 with what we now call unlifesome8 blendlore5, the blendlore5 of stuffs9 which are not linked10 with living things. A great deal of11 inlooking12 was needed13 to unhele14 the beinghood15 of the many firststuffs16 and their bondhoods17—how they make the sundry18 fairly19 straightforward20 blends21 found in rocks, earth, and so on22. This early blendlore5 was truly23 meaningful24 for worldlore4. The dealing25 between the two seeklores26 was truly23 great since27 the thoughtlay28 of urmotes29 was borne out30 a great deal31 by forseekings32 in blendlore5. The thoughtlay28 of blendlore5, that is33, of the shapeshifts34 themselves, was outlined35 a great deal31 in Mendeleev's table37 of firststuffs36, which brings out many odd38 bondhoods17 among the sundry18 firststuffs16, and it was the set39 of laws40 as to which stuff41 is blended42 with which, and how, that made up43 unlifesome8 blendlore5. All these laws40 were in the end44 spelled out45 in thought46 by scorenly worldworkings47, so that thoughtsome48 blendlore5 is in truth49 worldlore4. On the other hand, it must be underscored50 that this telling51 is in thought alone52. We have already talked over53 the otherness54 between knowing the laws40 of the game of chess55, and being fit to56 play. So it is that we may know the laws40, but we cannot play truly23 well. It turns out57 to be truly23 hard58 to foresee59 well60 what will happen in a given blendish61 shapeshift62; nevertheless, the deepest bit63 of thoughtsome48 blendlore5 must end up in scorenly worldworkings47. | ᚧᛟ ᚴᛁᚳᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛇᛉ ᛗᛖᛒᛁ ᚧᛟ ᛗᚩᚴᛏ ᛞᛁᛈᛚᛁ ᚴᚹᛖᛞ ᛒᚪᛄ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛇᛉ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᛄᚩᚱᛚᛁ᛬ ᚧᛟ ᛟᚱᛚᛁ ᛞᛖᛉ ᛟᚡ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛞᛠᛚᛏ ᚪᛚᛗᚩᚴᛏ ᚺᚩᛚᛚᛁ ᚹᛇᚦ ᚹᚪᛏ ᚹᛁ ᚾᚪᚹ ᚳᚪᛚ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᚧᛟ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛟᚡ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚪᚱ ᚾᚪᛏ ᛚᛇᛝᚳᛏ ᚹᛇᚦ ᛚᛇᚡᛇᛝ ᚦᛇᛝᛉ᛫ ᛖ ᚷᚱᛖᛏ ᛞᛁᛚ ᛟᚡ ᛇᚾᛚᚣᚳᛇᛝ ᚹᛟᛉ ᚾᛁᛞᛇᛞ ᛏᚢ ᛟᚾᚺᛁᛚ ᚧᛟ ᛒᛁᛇᛝᚺᚣᛞ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᛗᛠᚾᛁ ᚠᛟᚱᚴᛏᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚧᛖᚱ ᛒᚪᚾᛞᚺᚣᛞᛉ᛫ ᚺᚪᚹ ᚧᛖ ᛗᛖᚳ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛟᚾᛞᚱᛁ ᚠᛖᚱᛚᛁ ᚴᛏᚱᛖᛏᚠᚩᚱᚹᛟᚱᛞ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛉ ᚠᚪᚹᚾᛞ ᛇᚾ ᚱᚪᚳᚴ᛬ ᛟᚱᚦ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚴᚩ ᚪᚾ᛫ ᚧᛇᚴ ᛟᚱᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛟᛉ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᛗᛁᚾᛇᛝᚠᚣᛚ ᚠᚩᚱ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᚧᛟ ᛞᛁᛚᛇᛝ ᛒᛁᛏᚹᛁᚾ ᚧᛟ ᛏᚢ ᚴᛁᚳᛚᚩᚱᛉ ᚹᛟᛉ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᚷᚱᛖᛏ ᚴᛇᚾᚴ ᚧᛟ ᚦᚪᛏᛚᛖ ᛟᚡ ᛟᚱᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚹᛟᛉ ᛒᚩᚱᚾ ᚪᚹᛏ ᛖ ᚷᚱᛖᛏ ᛞᛁᛚ ᛒᚪᛄ ᚠᚩᚱᚴᛁᚳᛇᛝᛉ ᛇᚾ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᚧᛟ ᚦᚪᛏᛚᛖ ᛟᚡ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᚧᚫᛏ ᛇᛉ᛬ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᛋᛖᛈᛋᛇᚠᛏᚴ ᚧᛠᛗᚴᛠᛚᚡᛉ᛬ ᚹᛟᛉ ᚪᚹᛏᛚᚪᛄᚾᛞ ᛖ ᚷᚱᛖᛏ ᛞᛁᛚ ᛇᚾ ᛗᛠᚾᛞᛟᛚᛖᛠᚡᛉ ᛏᛖᛒᛚ ᛟᚡ ᚠᛟᚱᚴᛏᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ᛬ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛒᚱᛇᛝᛉ ᚪᚹᛏ ᛗᛠᚾᛁ ᚪᛞ ᛒᚪᚾᛞᚺᚣᛞᛉ ᛟᛗᛟᛝ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛟᚾᛞᚱᛁ ᚠᛟᚱᚴᛏᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛇᛏ ᚹᛟᛉ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛠᛏ ᛟᚡ ᛚᚪᛉ ᚫᛉ ᛏᚢ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚴᛏᛟᚠ ᛇᛉ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛇᛞ ᚹᛇᚦ ᚹᛇᛣ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚺᚪᚹ᛬ ᚧᚫᛏ ᛗᛖᛞ ᛟᛈ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᚪᛚ ᚧᛁᛉ ᛚᚪᛉ ᚹᛟᚱ ᛇᚾ ᚧᛟ ᛠᚾᛞ ᚴᛈᛠᛚᛞ ᚪᚹᛏ ᛇᚾ ᚦᚪᛏ ᛒᚪᛄ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛇᚾᛚᛁ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ᛬ ᚴᚩ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚦᚪᛏᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛇᛉ ᛇᚾ ᛏᚱᚢᚦ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᚪᚾ ᚧᛟ ᛟᚧᛟᚱ ᚺᚫᚾᛞ᛬ ᛇᛏ ᛗᛟᚴᛏ ᛒᛁ ᛟᚾᛞᛟᚱᚴᚳᚩᚱᛞ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚧᛇᚴ ᛏᛠᛚᛇᛝ ᛇᛉ ᛇᚾ ᚦᚪᛏ ᛟᛚᚩᚾ᛫ ᚹᛁ ᚺᚫᚡ ᚪᛚᚱᛠᛞᛁ ᛏᚪᚳᛏ ᚩᚡᛟᚱ ᚧᛟ ᛟᚧᛟᚱᚾᛇᚴ ᛒᛁᛏᚹᛁᚾ ᚾᚩᛇᛝ ᚧᛟ ᛚᚪᛉ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᚷᛖᛗ ᛟᚡ ᛣᛠᚴ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛒᛁᛇᛝ ᚠᛇᛏ ᛏᚢ ᛈᛚᛖ᛫ ᚴᚩ ᛇᛏ ᛇᛉ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚹᛁ ᛗᛖ ᚾᚩ ᚧᛟ ᛚᚪᛉ᛬ ᛒᛟᛏ ᚹᛁ ᚳᚫᚾᚾᚪᛏ ᛈᛚᛖ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᚹᛠᛚ᛫ ᛇᛏ ᛏᛟᚱᚾᛉ ᚪᚹᛏ ᛏᚢ ᛒᛁ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᚺᚪᚱᛞ ᛏᚢ ᚠᚩᚱᚴᛁ ᚹᛠᛚ ᚹᚪᛏ ᚹᛇᛚ ᚺᚫᛈᛇᚾ ᛇᚾ ᛖ ᚷᛇᚡᛇᚾ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛇᛋ ᛋᛖᛈᛋᛇᚠᛏ᛫ ᚾᛠᚡᛟᚱᚧᛟᛚᛠᚴ᛬ ᚧᛟ ᛞᛁᛈᛇᚴᛏ ᛒᛇᛏ ᛟᚡ ᚦᚪᛏᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛗᛟᚴᛏ ᛠᚾᛞ ᛟᛈ ᛇᚾ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛇᚾᛚᛁ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ᛫ |
| 2 | There is also a branch1 of physics2 and chemistry3 which was developed4 by both sciences5 together, and which is extremely6 important7. This is the method8 of statistics9 applied10 in a situation11 in which there are mechanical12 laws, which is aptly13 called statistical mechanics14. In any chemical15 situation11 a large16 number17 of atoms18 are involved19, and we have seen that the atoms18 are all jiggling20 around21 in a very22 random23 and complicated24 way. If we could analyze25 each collision26, and be able to27 follow in detail28 the motion29 of each molecule30, we might hope to figure out31 what would happen, but the many numbers32 needed to keep track33 of all these molecules34 exceeds35 so enormously36 the capacity37 of any computer38, and certainly39 the capacity37 of the mind, that it was important40 to develop41 a method42 for dealing with such complicated24 situations43. Statistical mechanics14, then, is the science44 of the phenomena45 of heat, or thermodynamics46. Inorganic47 chemistry3 is, as a science44, now reduced48 essentially49 to what are called physical50 chemistry3 and quantum51 chemistry3; physical50 chemistry3 to study52 the rates53 at which reactions54 occur55 and what is happening in detail28 (How do the molecules34 hit? Which pieces56 fly off first?, etc57.), and quantum51 chemistry3 to help us understand what happens in terms of58 the physical50 laws. | There is also a strain1 of worldlore2 and blendlore3 which was fostered4 by both seeklores5 together, and which is highly6 meaningful7. This is the workway8 of oddslore9 laid on10 in a lay11 in which there are worksome12 laws, which is fitly13 called oddslore workings14. In any blendish15 lay11 a great16 score17 of urmotes18 are inwrapped19, and we have seen that the urmotes18 are all wiggling20 about21 in a truly22 oddsome23 and intangled24 way. If we could think through25 each clash26, and be fit to27 follow in keenmark28 the path29 of each mote30, we might hope to work out31 what would happen, but the many scores32 needed to keep track33 of all these motes34 overruns35 so greatly36 the might37 of any reckoner38, and iwis39 the might37 of the mind, that it was forehanded40 to foster41 a way42 for dealing with such intangled24 lays43. Oddslore workings14, then, is the seeklore44 of the hapthings45 of heat, or heatworkings46. Unlifesome47 blendlore3 is, as a seeklore44, now lessened48 mostly49 to what are called worldly50 blendlore3 and scorenly51 blendlore3; worldly50 blendlore3 to learn52 the speeds53 at which shapeshifts54 happen55 and what is happening in keenmark28 (How do the motes34 hit? Which bits56 fly off first?, and so on57.), and scorenly51 blendlore3 to help us understand what happens with standing to58 the worldly50 laws. | ᚧᛖᚱ ᛇᛉ ᚪᛚᚴᚩ ᛖ ᚴᛏᚱᛖᚾ ᛟᚡ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚹᛟᛉ ᚠᚪᚴᛏᛟᚱᛞ ᛒᚪᛄ ᛒᚩᚦ ᚴᛁᚳᛚᚩᚱᛉ ᛏᛟᚷᛠᚧᛟᚱ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛇᛉ ᚺᚪᛄᛚᛁ ᛗᛁᚾᛇᛝᚠᚣᛚ᛫ ᚧᛇᚴ ᛇᛉ ᚧᛟ ᚹᛟᚱᚳᚹᛖ ᛟᚡ ᚪᛞᛉᛚᚩᚱ ᛚᛖᛞ ᚪᚾ ᛇᚾ ᛖ ᛚᛖ ᛇᚾ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚧᛖᚱ ᚪᚱ ᚹᛟᚱᚳᚴᛟᛗ ᛚᚪᛉ᛬ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛇᛉ ᚠᛇᛏᛚᛁ ᚳᚪᛚᛞ ᚪᛞᛉᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ᛫ ᛇᚾ ᛠᚾᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛇᛋ ᛚᛖ ᛖ ᚷᚱᛖᛏ ᚴᚳᚩᚱ ᛟᚡ ᛟᚱᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚪᚱ ᛇᚾᚱᚫᛈᛏ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚹᛁ ᚺᚫᚡ ᚴᛁᚾ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚧᛟ ᛟᚱᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚪᚱ ᚪᛚ ᚹᛇᚷᛚᛇᛝ ᛟᛒᚪᚹᛏ ᛇᚾ ᛖ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᚪᛞᚴᛟᛗ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛇᚾᛏᚫᛝᚷᛚᛞ ᚹᛖ᛫ ᛇᚠ ᚹᛁ ᚳᚣᛞ ᚦᛇᛝᚳ ᚦᚱᚢ ᛁᛣ ᚳᛚᚫᛋ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛒᛁ ᚠᛇᛏ ᛏᚢ ᚠᚪᛚᚩ ᛇᚾ ᚳᛁᚾᛗᚪᚱᚳ ᚧᛟ ᛈᚫᚦ ᛟᚡ ᛁᛣ ᛗᚩᛏ᛬ ᚹᛁ ᛗᛟᛄᛏ ᚺᚩᛈ ᛏᚢ ᚹᛟᚱᚳ ᚪᚹᛏ ᚹᚪᛏ ᚹᚣᛞ ᚺᚫᛈᛇᚾ᛬ ᛒᛟᛏ ᚧᛟ ᛗᛠᚾᛁ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛉ ᚾᛁᛞᛇᛞ ᛏᚢ ᚳᛁᛈ ᛏᚱᚫᚳ ᛟᚡ ᚪᛚ ᚧᛁᛉ ᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚩᚡᛟᚱᚱᛟᚾᛉ ᚴᚩ ᚷᚱᛖᛏᛚᛁ ᚧᛟ ᛗᛟᛄᛏ ᛟᚡ ᛠᚾᛁ ᚱᛠᚳᛟᚾᛟᚱ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛇᚹᛇᚴ ᚧᛟ ᛗᛟᛄᛏ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᛗᚪᛄᚾᛞ᛬ ᚧᚫᛏ ᛇᛏ ᚹᛟᛉ ᚠᚩᚱᚺᚫᚾᛞᛇᛞ ᛏᚢ ᚠᚪᚴᛏᛟᚱ ᛖ ᚹᛖ ᚠᚩᚱ ᛞᛁᛚᛇᛝ ᚹᛇᚦ ᚴᛟᛣ ᛇᚾᛏᚫᛝᚷᛚᛞ ᛚᛖᛉ᛫ ᚪᛞᛉᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ᛬ ᚧᛠᚾ᛬ ᛇᛉ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛁᚳᛚᚩᚱ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᚺᚫᛈᚦᛇᛝᛉ ᛟᚡ ᚺᛁᛏ᛬ ᚩᚱ ᚺᛁᛏᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ᛫ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛇᛉ᛬ ᚫᛉ ᛖ ᚴᛁᚳᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᚾᚪᚹ ᛚᛠᚴᛇᚾᛞ ᛗᚩᚴᛏᛚᛁ ᛏᚢ ᚹᚪᛏ ᚪᚱ ᚳᚪᛚᛞ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛇᚾᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛫ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛏᚢ ᛚᛟᚱᚾ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛈᛁᛞᛉ ᚫᛏ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛋᛖᛈᛋᛇᚠᛏᚴ ᚺᚫᛈᛇᚾ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚹᚪᛏ ᛇᛉ ᚺᚫᛈᛇᚾᛇᛝ ᛇᚾ ᚳᛁᚾᛗᚪᚱᚳ ᚺᚪᚹ ᛞᚢ ᚧᛟ ᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚺᛇᛏ᛫ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛒᛇᛏᚴ ᚠᛚᚪᛄ ᚪᚠ ᚠᛟᚱᚴᛏ᛫᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚴᚩ ᚪᚾ᛫᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛇᚾᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛏᚢ ᚺᛠᛚᛈ ᛟᚴ ᛟᚾᛞᛟᚱᚴᛏᚫᚾᛞ ᚹᚪᛏ ᚺᚫᛈᛇᚾᛉ ᚹᛇᚦ ᚴᛏᚫᚾᛞᛇᛝ ᛏᚢ ᚧᛟ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᛁ ᛚᚪᛉ᛫ |
| 3 | The other branch1 of chemistry2 is organic3 chemistry2, the chemistry2 of the substances4 which are associated5 with living things. For a time it was believed that the substances4 which are associated5 with living things were so marvelous6 that they could not be made by hand, from inorganic7 materials8. This is not at all true—they are just9 the same as the substances4 made in inorganic7 chemistry2, but more complicated10 arrangements11 of atoms12 are involved13. Organic3 chemistry2 obviously14 has a very15 close16 relationship17 to the biology18 which supplies19 its substances4, and to industry20, and furthermore, much physical21 chemistry2 and quantum mechanics22 can be applied23 to organic3 as well as to inorganic7 compounds24. However, the main problems25 of organic3 chemistry2 are not in these aspects26, but rather in the analysis27 and synthesis28 of the substances4 which are formed29 in biological30 systems31, in living things. This leads imperceptibly32, in steps, toward biochemistry33, and then into biology18 itself, or molecular34 biology18. | The other strain1 of blendlore2 is lifesome3 blendlore2, the blendlore2 of the stuffs4 which are linked5 with living things. For a time it was believed that the stuffs4 which are linked5 with living things were so wonderful6 that they could not be made by hand, from unlifesome7 stuffs8. This is not at all true—they are the selfsame9 as the stuffs4 made in unlifesome7 blendlore2, but more intangled10 layouts11 of urmotes12 are inwrapped13. Lifesome3 blendlore2 sheerly14 has a truly15 near16 bondhood17 to the lifelore18 which yields19 its stuffs4, and to theedom20, and furthermore, much worldly21 blendlore2 and scorenly worldworkings22 can be laid on23 to lifesome3 as well as to unlifesome7 blends24. However, the main snags25 of lifesome3 blendlore2 are not in these sides26, but rather in the inlooking27 and upmelding28 of the stuffs4 which are shaped29 in lifelorish30 networks31, in living things. This leads unwittenly32, in steps, toward lifestufflore33, and then into lifelore18 itself, or motish34 lifelore18. | ᚧᛟ ᛟᚧᛟᚱ ᚴᛏᚱᛖᚾ ᛟᚡ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛇᛉ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᚧᛟ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚪᚱ ᛚᛇᛝᚳᛏ ᚹᛇᚦ ᛚᛇᚡᛇᛝ ᚦᛇᛝᛉ᛫ ᚠᚩᚱ ᛖ ᛏᚪᛄᛗ ᛇᛏ ᚹᛟᛉ ᛒᛁᛚᛁᚡᛞ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚪᚱ ᛚᛇᛝᚳᛏ ᚹᛇᚦ ᛚᛇᚡᛇᛝ ᚦᛇᛝᛉ ᚹᛟᚱ ᚴᚩ ᚹᛟᚾᛞᛟᚱᚠᚣᛚ ᚧᚫᛏ ᚧᛖ ᚳᚣᛞ ᚾᚪᛏ ᛒᛁ ᛗᛖᛞ ᛒᚪᛄ ᚺᚫᚾᛞ᛬ ᚠᚱᛟᛗ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ᛫ ᚧᛇᚴ ᛇᛉ ᚾᚪᛏ ᚫᛏ ᚪᛚ ᛏᚱᚢ᛫ ᚧᛖ ᚪᚱ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛠᛚᚠᚴᛖᛗ ᚫᛉ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᛗᛖᛞ ᛇᚾ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᛒᛟᛏ ᛗᚩᚱ ᛇᚾᛏᚫᛝᚷᛚᛞ ᛚᛖᚪᚹᛏᚴ ᛟᚡ ᛟᚱᛗᚩᛏᚴ ᚪᚱ ᛇᚾᚱᚫᛈᛏ᛫ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᛋᛁᚱᛚᛁ ᚺᚫᛉ ᛖ ᛏᚱᚢᛚᛁ ᚾᛁᚱ ᛒᚪᚾᛞᚺᚣᛞ ᛏᚢ ᚧᛟ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᛚᚩᚱ ᚹᛇᛣ ᛄᛁᛚᛞᛉ ᛇᛏᚴ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛏᚢ ᚦᛁᛞᛟᛗ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚠᛟᚱᚧᛟᚱᛗᚩᚱ᛬ ᛗᛟᛣ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᛚᛁ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚴᚳᚩᚱᛇᚾᛚᛁ ᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞᚹᛟᚱᚳᛇᛝᛉ ᚳᚫᚾ ᛒᛁ ᛚᛖᛞ ᚪᚾ ᛏᚢ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᚫᛉ ᚹᛠᛚ ᚫᛉ ᛏᚢ ᛟᚾᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛉ᛫ ᚺᚪᚹᛠᚡᛟᚱ᛬ ᚧᛟ ᛗᛖᚾ ᚴᚾᚫᚷᛉ ᛟᚡ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛟᛗ ᛒᛚᛠᚾᛞᛚᚩᚱ ᚪᚱ ᚾᚪᛏ ᛇᚾ ᚧᛁᛉ ᚴᚪᛄᛞᛉ᛬ ᛒᛟᛏ ᚱᚫᚧᛟᚱ ᛇᚾ ᚧᛟ ᛇᚾᛚᚣᚳᛇᛝ ᚫᚾᛞ ᛟᛈᛗᛠᛚᛞᛇᛝ ᛟᚡ ᚧᛟ ᚴᛏᛟᚠᚴ ᚹᛇᛣ ᚪᚱ ᛋᛖᛈᛏ ᛇᚾ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᛚᚩᚱᛇᛋ ᚾᛠᛏᚹᛟᚱᚳᚴ᛬ ᛇᚾ ᛚᛇᚡᛇᛝ ᚦᛇᛝᛉ᛫ ᚧᛇᚴ ᛚᛠᛞᛉ ᛟᚾᚹᛇᛏᛇᚾᛚᛁ᛬ ᛇᚾ ᚴᛏᛠᛈᚴ᛬ ᛏᚹᚩᚱᛞ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᚴᛏᛟᚠᛚᚩᚱ᛬ ᚫᚾᛞ ᚧᛠᚾ ᛇᚾᛏᚢ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᛚᚩᚱ ᛇᛏᚴᛠᛚᚠ᛬ ᚩᚱ ᛗᚩᛞᛇᛋ ᛚᛟᛄᚠᛚᚩᚱ᛫ |